Thoughts on ‘one World, one Net, one Vision’: Joint Symposium on the Internet Governance Forum 2019 of the United Nations

BY ANNA SOPHIA TIEDEKE, MATTHIAS K. KLATT

That the Internet is more than a global infrastructure is old news. But the changes and challenges to our global understanding of territorial boarders, governance, sovereignty and communication are still ongoing and many question still remain unanswered or unconsidered. The Internet is subject to diverse developments and has many challenges in store for the law.

The Internet Governance Forum

With the United Nations Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security (GGE) and Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) there are formally establish Institutions that deal with global issues of the Internet – primarily with issues of cyber security and consist of UN Member States.

But there are also private actors like the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), that still form and provide the logical infrastructure of the Internet. The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) that was established at the International Telecommunication Union’s (ITU) World Summit on Information Society (WSIS) fourteen years ago and will take place during the next week in Berlin, serves a different purpose. It allows different organizations ranging from civil society, expert groups and individuals from the fields of science, technology, business, politics including ministries to freely and openly exchange views on how the rules of the Internet should look like. It operates on the grounds of the belief that only through participation the Internet can truly serve the global common good.

Right now, the IGF is at a turning point. Critics, who forced a review of the IGF by the High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation in 2020, want to change the function and role of the IGF. Among other things, they ask for a more effective institution that contributes directly to policy and norm development. This view neglects the fact that the IGF was consciously designed to do exactly the opposite. And that the strength of the IGF lies in the fact that it is an independent, informal open forum for the exchange of ideas.

Joint Symposium of Völkerrechtsblog and JuWiss-Blog

In a Symposium together with the JuWiss-Blog, the Völkerrechtsblog will contribute to emphasize the strengths of the IGF: Which are to promote the discussions and the open exchange of points of views and opinions. Challenges and possibilities have not only changed because of the Internet but have also become more diverse and complex. The symposium will touch on some of the manifold issues that arise in this context. On the Völkerrechtsblog Amélie Heldt discusses Hate Speech as a global challenge, Giovanni de Gregorio will address ‘Free Speech in the Age of Online Content Moderation’ and Jonathan Zittrain will take us on a journey through the three era’s of digital governance. In his ‘Tale of two foundational orders’ Matthias C. Kettemann will tell us why it is essential to understand both international law and internet governance in order to understand the internet and Dennis Redeker will introduce his thoughts on a ‘Contract for the Web’.

On the JuWiss-Blog, Friedrich Schmitt will take a closer look at the state freedom of opinion formation especially in the context of changed governmental public relations. Quirin Weinzierl joins our symposium with an blogpost on “Law through procedures – the far too little-noticed importance of procedures in Internet governance”. Keno C. Potthast will sheds light on political microtargeting from a communication science and jurisprudential perspective. Matthias K. Klatt will discuss whether German constitutional law, in particular the rule of law principle (Rechtsstaatsprinzip), imposes an obligation on the state to ensure adequate cyber security of its institutions.

On a side note

We are looking forward to a discussion inspired by the various blog posts. In the spirit of the open exchange of points of views and opinions that the IGF promotes we also want to draw attention to the event ‘Many Worlds. Many Nets. Many Visions’ hosted by the Humboldt Insitute for Internet and Society (HIIG) on 26 November 2019, challenging this year’s IGF slogan. This event will also be an opportunity to meet some of the contributing authors.

 

Zitiervorschlag: Tiedeke/Klatt, Thoughts on ‘one World, one Net, one Vision’ – Joint Symposium on the Internet Governance Forum 2019 of the United Nations, JuWissBlog Nr. 99/2019 v. 25.11.2019, https://www.juwiss.de/99-2018/

Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung – Nicht kommerziell – Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International Lizenz.

 

Governance, Internet, Internet Governance Forum, Medienrecht,
Nächster Beitrag
Cyber-Security als Rechtsstaatspflicht
Vorheriger Beitrag
Doppelstandard oder Konsistenz? Der EuGH zur Kennzeichnungspflicht von Siedlungsprodukten

Ähnliche Beiträge

von ANNA SCHIMKE Jüngst hat der EuGH entschieden, dass Google unter bestimmten Umständen dazu verpflichtet ist, Daten aus den Suchergebnissen zu entfernen, die rechtmäßig auf Webseiten Dritter veröffentlicht wurden. Das Stichwort zum Urteil lautet ‚Recht auf Vergessenwerden‘. Inhalt des Rechts auf Vergessenwerden Das Recht auf Vergessenwerden wird in der Regel…
Weiterlesen

Ungleichbehandlung durch Digitalzwang

Philipp Schüpferling
von PHILIPP SCHÜPFERLING Der Digitalcourage Verein hat vor Kurzem eine Petition gestartet, in der er beabsichtigt, den Gleichheitssatz des Art. 3 GG um ein Verbot zu ergänzen. Dadurch will der Verein verhindern, dass Personen bei Fragen der Grundversorgung benachteiligt werden, wenn sie keine digitale Infrastruktur nutzen möchten oder mangels technischen Verständnisses…
Weiterlesen
von Alexander Pirang Social media platforms have an inglorious history of algorithmically promoting and amplifying misinformation, hate, and other repulsive behavior. These are serious challenges to the health of our information eco-systems, and they continue to persist, despite platforms’ pledges to tackle the problem. However, we should not overlook another…
Weiterlesen

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Bitte füllen Sie dieses Feld aus.
Bitte füllen Sie dieses Feld aus.
Bitte gib eine gültige E-Mail-Adresse ein.